Corporate Event Entertainment Budget Guide (2026) | DJ Will Gill
Corporate event entertainment budgets in 2026 sit at an inflection point. After several years of post-pandemic compression where entertainment was treated as the residual line item after venue and food and beverage consumed the bulk of the budget, companies are now restoring entertainment investment to strategic priority recognizing that the entertainment programming is what distinguishes their event from competitors’ events, drives attendee satisfaction scores, and produces the workforce engagement outcomes that justify the entire event’s existence. The budget direction is upward, the scrutiny from finance leadership has intensified, and the planners who navigate this environment successfully are the ones who understand industry benchmarks, can justify entertainment allocations with documented data, and select talent that delivers measurable ROI rather than generic event filler. This guide provides the framework.
This 2026 budget guide walks through corporate event entertainment economics as a working planner’s resource why budgets are rising, industry benchmarks for entertainment spend as percentage of total event budget and per-attendee allocation, budget tiers by event scale from intimate to major-scale, allocation patterns by event type from galas to retreats to virtual programs, the cost drivers that shape entertainment pricing, the hidden costs planners frequently overlook, ROI frameworks that justify entertainment investment to budget-holders, and the practical strategies for working with talent within budget constraints.
Key Takeaways
→ Corporate event budgets are rising broadly in 2026. 2026 event industry analysis citing Momencio documented that 67% of executives increased their meeting budgets in 2025 and average corporate event spending reached approximately $169 per attendee per day. The direction signals that leadership is treating events as a strategic investment rather than a discretionary expense, which creates both opportunity (more budget available for strong programming) and pressure (heightened scrutiny on how the budget is spent).
→ Most corporate event budgets are dominated by venue and food. 2026 industry analysis documented that 65% of corporate event budgets go toward venue and food costs, leaving entertainment as an afterthought line item in many companies’ planning with food and beverage alone typically representing 40-50% of total event costs in most U.S. corporate events. The allocation pattern creates an opportunity: companies that invest deliberately in entertainment distinguish their events from competitors who default to maximizing venue and catering at entertainment’s expense.
→ Industry per-attendee benchmarks span a wide range by event type. 2026 corporate event pricing research documented that planners typically budget $150-$300 per attendee for basic corporate events, $300-$500 for mid-range experiences, and $500-$1,000+ for premium conferences with travel. Additional industry analysis documented small meetings at $100-$300 per attendee, conferences at $500-$1,500, and multi-day retreats at $2,000-$4,000 per attendee, with executive retreats and international incentive trips often exceeding $5,000 per attendee. The wide ranges reflect substantial scope variation; the planner’s job is to identify which tier matches the company’s strategic intent.
→ Virtual events deliver substantially better economics. 2026 virtual team building research documented that virtual events cost 75% less than in-person alternatives while delivering up to 12% higher ROI, with companies investing in team building seeing $4 returned for every $1 spent. The economics shift the budget conversation, virtual programming lets companies run more frequent engagement events within the same annual budget than in-person formats permit, producing compounding cultural value across the calendar.
→ Cost pressure is real but manageable through deliberate allocation. 2026 Maritz Global Events Industry Trends Report projected average overall cost increases of 2-4% across hotels, airfare, F&B, and event-staff wages through 2026-2028, with 28% of planners planning to reduce F&B, 30% changing venues, and 27% cutting giveaways to reallocate spend toward the core attendee experience. The reallocation pattern is significant planners are explicitly defending entertainment and experience budgets while reducing peripheral spend.
For a custom quote calibrated to your event scope, contact DJ Will Gill directly.
Why Corporate Event Entertainment Budgets Are Rising in 2026
The Executive Investment Direction
The leadership-priority layer. 2026 industry analysis citing Momencio documented that 67% of executives increased their meeting budgets in 2025. The direction is unambiguous leadership is recognizing that events produce measurable workforce and customer outcomes, and the budget allocation reflects that recognition. The shift creates both opportunity and accountability for planners: more money is available, but stakeholders expect to see results that justify the increased investment.
The Market Expansion Data
The category-growth layer. 2026 industry analysis projected that the global corporate events market will grow from $325 billion in 2026 to $595.27 billion by 2029. The expansion reflects sustained corporate investment in live and hybrid programming as core infrastructure rather than a discretionary expense. Companies that don’t invest in events at competitive levels with industry peers fall behind on talent recruitment, customer relationships, and brand visibility.
The Inflation and Cost Pressure Context
The pricing-environment layer. The Maritz Global Events March 2026 Industry Trends Report projects average overall cost increases of 2-4% across hotels, airfare, F&B, and event-staff wages through 2026-2028. The increases are modest by recent inflation standards, but compound across multiple event categories a 3% increase on a $500,000 event budget reads small as a percentage, but adds $15,000 in real spend that has to come from somewhere. Strong budget planning accounts for compounding cost pressure across the planning calendar rather than treating year-over-year stability as a default assumption.
The Experience Reallocation Trend
The strategic-priority-shift layer. 2026 Amex GBT Global Meetings & Events Forecast documented that 28% of planners plan to reduce F&B, 30% will change venues, and 27% will cut giveaways to reallocate spend toward the core attendee experience. The reallocation is meaningful, planners are explicitly protecting entertainment and experience programming while reducing peripheral spend. Companies that follow this allocation discipline produce stronger attendee outcomes than companies that maintain traditional spending patterns, favoring venue and catering at entertainment’s expense.
Industry Benchmarks for Entertainment Spend
Overall Budget Allocation Patterns
The categorical-split layer. 2026 industry analysis documented that across most corporate events in the United States, three categories typically consume 70-85% of the total budget venue, food and beverage, and audio-visual production with the remaining budget allocated to staffing, technology, transportation, branding, insurance, entertainment, and contingency planning. GoGather’s 2025 conference benchmarking data documented F&B at 32.5% of total spend and audio/visual at 19% of total spend as the highest-allocation categories.
Per-Attendee Baseline Ranges
The cost-per-person layer. 2026 corporate event pricing research documented planning budgets of $150-$300 per attendee for basic corporate events, $300-$500 for mid-range experiences, and $500-$1,000+ for premium conferences with travel these baselines covering venue, catering, AV, materials, and planning. 2026 industry data documented average corporate event spending reaching $169 per attendee per day as a cross-format baseline. The wide ranges reflect substantial variation by event type, location, and production tier.
Entertainment-Specific Pricing Benchmarks
The talent-cost layer. 2026 corporate event pricing analysis documented industry expert speakers at $5,000-$30,000, celebrity speakers ranging from $50,000 to $500,000+, and entertainment (bands, performers, DJs) typically running $2,000-$50,000 depending on talent tier, format complexity, and travel requirements. The wide entertainment range reflects the diversity of options local DJ talent operates at the lower end, while celebrity DJs, premium specialty performers, and major-name bands operate at the upper end. Most corporate event entertainment lands in the middle of the range; companies should match the talent investment to the event’s strategic importance rather than defaulting to either extreme.
Conference Budget Floor Data
The minimum-viable-conference layer. 2026 conference cost analysis documented that conference budgets below $150,000 are difficult to execute well especially if food and beverage are included with the average per-person cost for a 2026 conference ranging from $500 to $2,500 and total conference costs typically ranging from $300,000 up to over $3,000,000. The floor matters because companies trying to produce conferences below the viable budget threshold often deliver compromised experiences that damage rather than build the company’s reputation with attendees.
Budget Tiers by Event Scale
Intimate Scale (Under 100 Attendees)
The smaller-audience layer. 2026 NYC corporate event planning analysis documented intimate corporate events (under 100 guests) at typical $25,000-$50,000 budget tiers in major markets like New York. The tier supports refined production at a smaller scale, quality DJ talent, polished emcee work, sophisticated atmospheric design, without the major-scale production infrastructure larger events require. Strong intimate-scale budget allocation treats the smaller audience as a production advantage rather than a constraint; the per-attendee investment is typically higher than larger events because relationship value per attendee at an intimate scale exceeds mass-audience economics.
Mid-Scale (100-300 Attendees)
The most common layer. 2026 industry analysis documented mid-scale corporate events (100-300 guest productions) at $50,000-$150,000 budget tier in major markets. This is the range where most corporate event budgets land, large enough to support a full production tier (DJ, emcee, recognition program, interactive entertainment, atmospheric design) while remaining within reach of most corporate event budgets. Strong mid-scale budget allocation uses the format’s flexibility, investing in entertainment as one of the strongest cost-effectiveness levers available at this scale.
Large Scale (300-500 Attendees)
The expanded-production layer. 2026 industry analysis documented large-scale corporate events (300+ guests) at $150,000-$500,000+ budget tier in major markets. The tier requires production scaling audio coverage across larger venues, visual elements that maintain engagement across the audience, and entertainment talent with documented experience at the relevant scale. 2026 cost analysis documented a realistic two-day conference for 500 attendees in Chicago or San Francisco with lodging included reaching $700-$800 per person, with food and venue alone often consuming 60-70% of the total budget.
Major Scale (500+ Attendees)
The arena-tier layer. Major-scale events (500-2,000+ attendees, multi-day, multiple venues/rooms, high-profile speakers, comprehensive production) operate at budget tiers reaching from substantial six figures into the millions. 2026 industry analysis documented total conference costs ranging up to over $3,000,000 for major-scale productions. At this tier, entertainment becomes a sub-budget within the broader production, typically including multiple performers, AV integration with broadcast production, custom content development, and the kind of talent that requires booking 6-12 months out.
Virtual Budget Tier
The reduced-cost layer. 2026 virtual team building research documented that virtual events cost 75% less than in-person alternatives while delivering up to 12% higher ROI. 2026 remote team building research documented good budgets for remote events at $25-$75 per person, depending on activity, with virtual cooking classes running $40-60 per person, Secret Santa exchanges capping at $25, and holiday escape rooms averaging $20-30 per person. The virtual tier lets companies run more frequent engagement events within the same annual budget than in-person formats permit.
Budget Allocation by Event Type
Corporate Galas and Awards Events
The high-production layer. Corporate galas and formal awards events typically operate at the highest production tier of the company’s event calendar, with formal attire, premium venue, plated dinner, multiple entertainment elements integrated across the evening (cocktail hour music, dinner programming, recognition delivery, post-program celebration). Entertainment allocation within gala budgets is typically a higher percentage-wise than other event types because the format depends on entertainment quality to land the formal program effectively. Strong gala budget allocation invests in talent capable of operating across the multi-modal format requirements rather than treating each function as a separate vendor.
Holiday Parties
The seasonal-celebration layer. 2026 workplace holiday research citing ezCater documented that 51% of companies increased their holiday party budgets year-over-year, with total average cost including venue, entertainment, and all expenses reaching approximately $693 per person and average per-person food and beverage spend at $59 (up 31% YoY). The holiday party is typically one of the highest-budget single events in the company’s calendar, combining substantial F&B with full entertainment programming for the year’s largest unified workforce gathering.
Conferences
The multi-day-format layer. 2026 conference cost analysis documented average per-person costs of $500-$2,500 with total conference budgets typically running $300,000 to $3,000,000+ depending on scale, location, and length. Conference entertainment allocation typically distributes across multiple touchpoints, including opening session energy injection, breakout session segments, networking reception entertainment, and after-party programming. The distributed allocation pattern produces a stronger overall conference experience than concentrating the entertainment budget into a single segment.
Retreats and Offsites
The premium-per-attendee layer. 2026 corporate event analysis documented multi-day retreats at $2,000-$4,000 per attendee, with executive retreats and international incentive trips often exceeding $5,000 per attendee. A three-night domestic resort retreat for 50 attendees recently landed around $2,700 per person, with international executive offsites for 20 leadership attendees exceeding $3,800 per attendee after lodging and travel. The high per-attendee economics reflect the premium nature of multi-day formats; entertainment allocation typically concentrates on the signature evening that anchors the retreat’s social character.
All-Hands and Recurring Events
The recurring-cadence layer. All-hands meetings and quarterly recurring events operate at lower per-event budgets than annual signature events but accumulate substantial spend across the calendar through frequency. Entertainment allocation at recurring events should be calibrated to support the format without overwhelming the operational content that the meetings are designed to deliver. Strong recurring-event budget allocation often books the same entertainment talent across the calendar; the consistency builds institutional knowledge and reduces per-event briefing costs.
Virtual Events
The reduced-cost-tier layer. Virtual event budgets shift entertainment to a different cost structure, no venue costs, no F&B, no travel, but technology infrastructure and platform costs that in-person events don’t carry. Entertainment talent costs in virtual contexts typically run lower than in-person equivalents because the talent operates without travel, and the production duration is typically shorter. The cost savings let companies run more frequent virtual events than in-person budgets permit, quarterly virtual all-hands programming, recurring virtual game show segments, and monthly virtual team-building activities.
What Drives Entertainment Cost
Talent Tier
The credential-pricing layer. Talent tier is the most consequential single cost driver. Local talent at the lower end of the entertainment range carries minimal premium for credentials or track record; nationally-recognized talent at the upper end carries substantial premium for documented Fortune 500 client portfolios, broadcast credits, industry recognition, and the track record that vetting processes look for at major events. Strong budget allocation matches the talent tier to the event’s strategic importance. Major company events with high stakeholder visibility justify the premium tier; smaller departmental gatherings can use lower-tier options effectively.
Event Location and Market
The geographic-premium layer. 2026 corporate event pricing research documented that major cities like NYC, SF, and London cost 30-50% more than secondary markets for event production. The premium applies broadly across vendor categories, venue, catering, AV, and entertainment, all of which carry market-driven cost variation. Entertainment specifically operates with talent-driven pricing rather than purely location-driven, but travel costs to events in non-home markets add meaningful spend to the entertainment line item.
Production Tier (Custom vs. Off-the-Shelf)
The customization-investment layer. Custom branded entertainment (game shows built around company content, music programming tailored to brand identity, emcee work scripted around specific organizational context) carries premium pricing relative to off-the-shelf format delivery. The premium reflects substantial pre-event development work, brand discovery, content research, custom material creation, and pre-event testing. Companies that invest in custom production produce events that distinguish their brand; companies that default to off-the-shelf content produce events that fade into the generic corporate event landscape.
Event Duration
The hours-of-coverage layer. Entertainment costs scale with the duration of talent coverage required. A two-hour cocktail reception requires less talent investment than a six-hour full-day event with multiple programming moments. Multi-day events (retreats, conferences, multi-day galas) require either dedicated talent across the duration or multiple talent bookings; both approaches add to the total entertainment budget. Strong duration-aware budget allocation matches the coverage to the actual production requirements rather than over-buying coverage that goes unused.
Travel Requirements
The logistics layer. Talent traveling to non-home markets adds meaningful cost to entertainment budgets, including flights, accommodation, ground transportation, and sometimes equipment shipping for technical-format performers. The travel premium can add 15-40% to the base entertainment cost, depending on the talent’s home market and the event location. Strong budget allocation either selects talent based on the event’s market when possible or factors travel costs explicitly rather than discovering them late in the planning process.
Multi-Day Versus Single-Day
The extended-engagement layer. Multi-day event entertainment typically operates with a different pricing structure than single-day events, often discounted per-day rates relative to single-day pricing in exchange for the extended engagement commitment. The structure benefits companies running multi-day retreats and conferences that book the same talent across the duration rather than booking different talent for each day. Strong multi-day budget conversations explicitly negotiate the extended-engagement discount rather than assuming standard single-day rates apply across multiple sessions.
Customization Depth
The pre-event-work layer. Customization depth, how much pre-event work the talent invests in tailoring the format to the specific event, drives cost more than most planners initially recognize. Light customization (using off-the-shelf format with company name and basic context) carries minimal premium; deep customization (game shows built around proprietary company content, music programming developed for specific brand identity, emcee work scripted to specific organizational nuances) carries substantial premium. The pre-event development time is the cost driver, not just the live performance hours.
AV and Tech Infrastructure
The infrastructure-budget layer. 2026 corporate event pricing research documented basic AV (screen, projector, microphones) starting at $1,000-$3,000, with full production (lighting, video, sound) running $10,000-$100,000+. Entertainment talent often requires specific AV infrastructure (proper microphones for emcee work, sound systems for DJ output, screens for visual game show content) that overlaps with the event’s broader AV budget. Strong planning coordinates entertainment requirements with the AV vendor early so the costs don’t surface as surprises mid-process.
Custom Content Development
The pre-production layer. Custom content development (branded game shows, custom trivia, scripted emcee material, branded slide decks) often gets quoted as part of the entertainment talent’s package, but the development time can add meaningful cost when calculated separately. Companies negotiating with talent should clarify whether custom development is included in the base quote or carries additional fees, and what the scope of “custom” means in the specific arrangement.
Travel and Accommodations for Talent
The talent-logistics layer. Talent travel costs (flights, hotel, ground transportation, per diem) often appear as separate line items rather than being included in the base entertainment fee. The structure benefits transparency but requires explicit budgeting. Companies that assume the entertainment fee includes travel often discover the additional cost late in planning. Strong budget allocation calculates travel costs explicitly at the booking stage rather than treating them as implementation details to be resolved later.
Multi-Vendor Coordination
The integration-overhead layer. Events that use multiple entertainment vendors (separate DJ, emcee, game show host, photo booth operator, etc.) incur coordination overhead that single-vendor arrangements don’t plan calls across multiple parties, on-site coordination during the event, and post-event coordination across multiple invoices. The overhead doesn’t appear as a line item but consumes meaningful planning time. Three-in-one service models that integrate DJ, emcee, and audience engagement through a single talent reduce this coordination tax substantially.
Rehearsal Time
The pre-event-preparation layer. Rehearsal time (pre-event run-throughs, tech tests, talent briefings) sometimes carries additional cost beyond the live event coverage. For complex multi-element productions, rehearsal investment is essential rather than optional but the cost should appear in the budget explicitly rather than emerging as a scope addition. Strong planning conversations include rehearsal expectations at the booking stage.
Insurance and Contracts
The legal-overhead layer. Some venues require entertainment talent to carry specific liability insurance levels that may exceed standard talent coverage. Companies should clarify insurance requirements at the venue contracting stage and verify that selected entertainment talent can meet the requirements without unexpected additional costs. Contract review by company legal teams adds time but not direct cost; the value protects against issues that would surface mid-event if contracts weren’t reviewed properly.
Backup Contingencies
The reliability-investment layer. Strong event planning includes backup contingency budgets (typically 10-15% of total event spend) to handle unexpected costs that emerge during execution. 2026 corporate event analysis documented that a 10-15% reserve prevents last-minute surprises from wrecking the budget. The contingency isn’t separate from the planning budget; it’s the strategic allocation that gives planners flexibility to address issues without escalating to leadership.
Service Charges, Taxes, and Fees
The hidden-percentages layer. 2026 industry analysis documented that taxes and service charges can add another 20-30% to catering expenses, with many planners underestimating these add-on costs. The pattern applies broadly across vendor categories, service charges, and processing fees accumulate across the budget in ways that the line-item proposals don’t initially make obvious. 2026 budget breakdown analysis documented common hidden costs including service charges, taxes, rigging, power, overtime labor, drayage, security minimums, and freight fees.
ROI Frameworks for Justifying Entertainment Spend
General Team Building ROI
The baseline-economics layer. 2026 virtual team building research documented that companies investing in team building see $4 returned for every $1 spent, with organizations operating comprehensive engagement programs reporting an 87% reduction in turnover. The 4:1 baseline is the foundational ROI metric to anchor entertainment budget conversations with finance leadership entertainment investment isn’t a cost; it’s an asset with measurable return.
Retention Math
The cost-of-turnover layer. 2026 team building research documented that retaining one mid-level employee typically saves $87,500 to $105,000 in replacement costs alone. The retention math anchors the strongest budget justification. An entertainment investment that retains even one mid-level employee through the year produces multiples of return on the entertainment cost in direct replacement savings, before accounting for productivity and institutional knowledge benefits.
Attendance and Satisfaction Lift
The engagement-metric layer. 2026 workplace research documented that 82% of employees planned to attend their company holiday party (up from 70%) and 83% say holiday parties help them bond with coworkers. The attendance and satisfaction metrics are directly trackable pre-event RSVP rates, day-of attendance, and post-event satisfaction scores. Strong ROI justification ties entertainment investment to measurable engagement metrics that finance can verify.
Recognition and Cultural Value
The qualitative-impact layer. Beyond the trackable metrics, entertainment investment produces cultural value that’s harder to quantify but real recognition moments that recipients carry across years, shared workforce experiences that become organizational memory, the cultural fabric that determines whether employees describe the company positively to friends and recruiters. The qualitative impact resists precise dollar attribution but contributes to brand strength and talent attractiveness in ways that finance increasingly acknowledges in budget conversations.
Content Amplification Economics
The shareability layer. Strong entertainment programming produces post-event content that extends the event’s reach beyond the room, including photos and video from game show segments and recognition moments, social posts from attendees, internal communications featuring event highlights. The amplified reach gives the entertainment investment a multiplier effect that pure venue or catering spend cannot match. Strong budget justification accounts for content amplification value alongside direct event outcomes.
Cost Per Attendee Tracking
The benchmarking layer. Cost-per-attendee tracking across events lets companies benchmark entertainment spend against attendance outcomes year over year. A reduced cost per attendee that maintains satisfaction scores reflects efficiency gain; an increased cost per attendee that improves satisfaction reflects strategic investment. Strong budget reporting includes per-attendee analysis across event categories. The metric is one of the most useful for cross-event comparison and longitudinal tracking.
Working With Talent Within Budget Constraints
Three-in-One Service Budget Efficiency
The integrated-talent layer. Three-in-one service models that integrate DJ, emcee, and audience engagement work through a single talent produce budget efficiency relative to separate-vendor arrangements. The integration reduces coordination overhead, eliminates the multiplicative travel cost issue (one talent’s travel rather than three), and produces production tier consistency across the event’s entertainment elements. DJ Will Gill operates a three-in-one corporate DJ, emcee, and audience engagement service model documented across Fortune 500 corporate event clients, including AT&T Business, CDW, Team USA, Virgin Galactic, NeoGenomics, Foot Locker, Home Depot, Hilton, BGCA, PepsiCo, PayPal, and the United Nations.
Recurring Booking Economics
The relationship-discount layer. Companies running recurring entertainment programs (annual holiday parties year over year, quarterly all-hands integration, monthly virtual game show segments) often negotiate retainer-style arrangements that produce better economics than transactional event-by-event booking. The structure benefits the company through cost predictability and consistent talent quality; the talent benefits from calendar stability that reduces sales overhead. Strong long-term partnerships often produce 10-25% effective cost reduction relative to spot booking equivalent services.
Off-Peak Scheduling
The calendar-flexibility layer. 2026 corporate event pricing research documented that weekday events (especially Tuesday-Thursday) typically cost 20-40% less than Friday-Sunday, with hotels offering better rates to fill weekday vacancies. The same pattern applies to entertainment talent high-demand dates (Saturday evenings in spring and fall, December weekends) carry premium pricing relative to off-peak alternatives. Companies with calendar flexibility can produce equivalent events at meaningfully lower total cost by scheduling deliberately into off-peak windows.
Virtual Format Leverage
The format-substitution layer. Companies facing tight budgets can substitute virtual programming for in-person events in cases where the strategic intent permits virtual all-hands instead of in-person quarterly meetings, virtual game shows instead of in-person team building retreats, and virtual holiday parties instead of multi-location in-person celebrations. 2026 virtual team building research documented 75% cost reduction relative to in-person alternatives with up to 12% higher ROI. See the Virtual Team Building Game Show resource for tactical details on virtual format options.
Proposal Comparison Discipline
The vetting layer. Strong entertainment budget management includes comparison across multiple talent proposals rather than booking the first available option. The comparison should evaluate not just the headline price but the scope of what’s included: custom content development, travel inclusions, AV requirements, rehearsal time, and contract terms. Apples-to-apples comparison reveals the actual cost differences across options, which are often substantial. Cheapest isn’t best; most expensive isn’t best either. The right talent matches the event’s strategic importance to a fair market rate for the scope being delivered.
Custom Quotes Versus Published Rates
The negotiation-foundation layer. Most professional corporate entertainment talent operates on custom quotes calibrated to specific event scope rather than published rate cards, and for good reason. Event-specific variables (duration, customization depth, travel requirements, AV needs, audience size, time of year) all affect pricing in ways that standardized rate cards cannot capture accurately. Companies should expect to provide event details to receive accurate quotes rather than assuming public rate information represents the company’s actual cost. The custom-quote model produces better outcomes for both sides. The company gets pricing reflecting the actual scope; the talent gets to scope the engagement appropriately rather than committing to undefined work.
About the Author
William “DJ Will Gill” Gilbert is a professional DJ and Emcee who’s been named by the Wall Street Journal as the Corporate DJ and Emcee for boosting company morale, performing corporate event entertainment across the budget spectrum at Fortune 500 scale through a three-in-one DJ, emcee, and audience engagement service model. Documented client work for AT&T Business, CDW, Team USA, Virgin Galactic, NeoGenomics, Foot Locker, Home Depot, Hilton, BGCA, PepsiCo, PayPal, and the United Nations. Also a Forbes Next 1000 honoree with broadcast credits including Super Bowl LIV (2020), The Voice (2011), and MTV’s The Real World: Hollywood (2008).
2,520+ Google Reviews · IMDB · Mixcloud · Instagram · Contact